dures with a description of the Northwestern Speed-Dating Study. Since its invention by Rabbi Finkel's and Eastwick's contributions to the North- western. Finkel's and Eastwick's contributions to the Northwestern Speed‐Dating Study ( NSDS) and to this article cannot be separated; they should both. Speed-Dating. Eli J. Finkel and Paul W. Eastwick. Northwestern University. ABSTRACT—Scholars have recently begun to harness the.
Executives from a popular speed-dating company confided in us that they have men rotate because a women often have more accessories with them at events e. The present results, however, present a cautionary note: Even subtle gender norms can have important consequences for romantic dynamics.
Indeed, when researchers adopt a procedure without controlling for it, they risk missing a component of what they study.
In this case, researchers just assumed that since men rotate in real-life, they should do so in speed-dating experiments. The researchers draw mixed conclusions: On the one hand, this sex difference did not significantly reverse at events where women rotated, so on average there was at least an overall trend in the present data for men to experience greater romantic approach i.
Given that men are generally expected, if not required as at professional speed-dating eventsto approach in romantic contexts, perhaps this factor alone could be sufficient to explain why women tend to be more selective than men. The present results are at least partially consistent with this possibility.
The current research calls into question the design of much of the past research in this area, so the answer has suddenly become a lot less clear. Best research practices in psychology: Illustrating epistemological and pragmatic considerations with the case of relationship science.
When does familiarity promote versus undermine interpersonal attraction? An integrative model from erstwhile adversaries.
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, Leveling the playing field: Acquaintance length predicts reduced assortative mating on attractiveness.
Psychological Science, 26, Induced relative left frontal cortical activity increases jealousy. Psychological distance makes the heart grow fonder: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, A Social Relations Model enhancement of the pairing game.
Teaching of Psychology, 41, Consensus and uniqueness in romantic evaluations. The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, The many voices of Darwin's descendants: Reply to Schmitt Is a meta-analysis a foundation or just another brick?
Study Questions Whether Women Are More Selective at Dating
The psychology of the pair-bond: Past and future contributions of close relationships research to evolutionary psychology.
Psychological Inquiry, 24, External validity, why art thou externally valid? Recent studies of attraction provide three theoretical answers. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, Romantic desire at the nexus of power possessed and power perceived. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, Trust and biased memory of transgressions in romantic relationships.
Sex differences in succumbing to sexual temptations: A function of impulse or control? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm. Attachment bonds moderate the function of ovulatory cycle adaptations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, Do ideal partnerpreferences predict divorce? A tale of two metrics. Social Psychological andPersonality Science, 3, A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science.
Paul Eastwick —
Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: A double dissociation in predictive validity. When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships?
Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22, Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction. In live interaction, does familiarity promote attraction or contempt?
A structural analysis of social behavior perspective on initial romantic encounters. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, Using phylogeny and constraint to inform the evolutionary psychology of human mating. Political orientation and interracial romantic desire.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, Possible selves in marital roles: The impact of the anticipated division of labor on the mate preferences of women and men.
Is it a game? Evidence for social influence in the virtual world. Social Influence, 4, Arbitrary social norms influence sex differences in romantic selectivity.
Psychological Science, 20, The attachment system in fledgling relationships: An activating role for attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94,