Attend an event | Redkite
Yahoo has a new iOS app called Yahoo Answers Now through which you can ask your questions and receive answers from people with. Buy used equipment & trucks at our Sacramento public auctions. View detailed equipment listings & photos. Inventory updated daily. Sign up for updates. how to start dating after spouse dies dating customs definition halo tmcc .. dating a younger girl yahoo answers kelowna matchmaking services seattle .. wightbay dating register max iron dating dating park in delhi dating losers youtube free .. yeon g dragon dating precision dating boca raton security hook up clearance.
Some indirect forms of hydromodification, such as erosion along streambanks or shorelines, are caused by the introduction or maintenance of dams and other activities, including many upland activities, that change the natural physical properties of a stream.
The following definitions are offered to clarify some key terms used throughout this document: Hydromodification can be defined as changes in a river or stream channel resulting either in an increase or decrease in the usual supply of water flowing through the channel, or in a change to the usual physical characteristics of the water or of the channel.
USEPA defines hydromodification as the "alteration of the hydrologic characteristics of coastal and non-coastal waters, which in turn could cause degradation of water resources. Channelization and channel modification include activities such as straightening, widening, deepening, and clearing channels of debris.
Categories of channelization and channel modification projects include flood control and A tree or branch embedded in a lake or stream bed and constituting a hazard to navigation; a standing dead tree. Channelization activities can play a critical role in NFS pollution by increasing the timing and delivery of pollutants, including sediment, that enter the water. Channelization can also be a cause of higher flows during storm events, which potentially increases the risk of flooding.
Dams2 are artificial barriers on waterbodies that impound or divert water and are built for a variety of purposes, including flood control, power generation, irrigation, navigation, and to create ponds, lakes, and reservoirs for uses such as livestock watering, municipal water supply, fish farming, and recreation.
Streambank and shoreline erosion are the wearing away of material in fastland area landward of the bank along non-tidal streams and rivers and the loss of beach fastland in tidal portions of coastal bays or estuaries. Streambank erosion occurs when the force of flowing water in a river or stream exceeds the ability of soil and vegetation to hold the banks in place. Eroded material is carried downstream and redeposited in the channel bottom or in point bars located along bends in the waterway.
In large open waterbodies, such as the Great Lakes or coastal bays and estuaries, waves and currents sort coarser sands and gravels from eroded bank materials and move them in both directions along the shore away from the area undergoing erosion through a process called littoral drift.
It is important to note that Streambank and shoreline erosion are natural processes and that natural background levels of erosion also exist. However, human activities along or adjacent to streambanks or shorelines may increase erosion and other nonpoint sources of pollution.
Hydromodification is one of the leading sources of impairment in our nation's waters. According to the National Water Quality Inventory: ApproximatelyDams are defined according to Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section Barriers that are six-feet or less in height, regardless of storage capacity or barriers that have a storage capacity at maximum water storage elevation of fifteen acre-feet or less regardless of height are not included.
Federal regulations define dams for the purpose of ensuring public safety. Most states use this or a very similar definition, which creates a category of dams that requires some form of inspection to ensure that they are structurally sound. Dams smaller than those defined above, such as those used to create farm ponds, are authorized under the NRCS program. EPA D - DRAFT July Introduction miles of assessed rivers and streams in the United States are impaired for one or more designated uses, which includes aquatic life support, fish consumption, primary contact recreation, secondary contact, drinking water supply, and agriculture.
Many of the pollutants causing impairment are delivered to surface and ground waters from diffuse sources, such as agricultural runoff, urban runoff, hydrologic modification, and atmospheric deposition of contaminants.
The leading causes of beneficial use impairment partially or not supporting one or more uses are nutrients, sediment, pathogens bacteriametals, pesticides, oxygen-depleting materials, and habitat alterations USEPA a.
The National Water Quality Inventory: Of the 11 pollution source categories listed in the report, hydromodification was ranked as the second leading source of impairment in assessed rivers, second in assessed lakes, and sixth in assessed estuaries Table 1. These activities may alter a lake's habitat in such a way that it becomes less suitable for aquatic life USEPA, a. I, are useful in providing an overview of the magnitude of problems associated with hydromodification.
Solutions, however, are usually applied at the local level. For example, in Maryland, the Shore Erosion Task Force, after investigating shore erosion in the state, published recommendations to be implemented under a Comprehensive Shore Erosion Control Plan. These state-local partnerships enable the state to better identify and correct shoreline erosion problems throughout Maryland MDNR, State and local elected officials and agencies, landowners, developers, environmental and conservation groups, and others play a crucial role in working together for protecting, maintaining, and restoring water resources that are impacted by hydromodification activities.
These local efforts, in aggregate, form the basis for changing the status of hydromodification as a national problem. This guidance document provides background information about NFS pollution and offers a variety of solutions for reducing NFS pollution resulting from hydromodification activities. The document describes examples of the implementation of practices that can be used to reduce NFS pollution from activities associated with channelization and channel modification, dams, and streambank and shoreline erosion.
Activities to Control NPS Pollution Historical Perspective During the first 15 years of the national program to abate and control water pollutionEPA and the states focused most of their water pollution control activities on traditional point sources, which are stationary locations or fixed facilities from which pollutants are discharged; any single identifiable source of pollution; e.
The NPDES program functions as the primary regulatory tool for assuring that state water quality standards are met. NPDES permits, issued by an authorized state or EPA, contain discharge limits designed to meet water quality standards and national technology-based effluent regulations.
Carlos Tevez - Wikipedia
Inin view of the progress achieved in controlling point sources and the growing national awareness of the increasingly dominant influence of NPS pollution on water quality, Congress amended the Clean Water Act to focus greater national efforts on nonpoint sources. These programs relate to watershed management and nonpoint source control. These funds can be used for projects that address nonpoint source related sources of pollution, including hydromodification.
More information about the Section program is provided at http: Under section of the Clean Water Act, persons planning to discharge dredged or fill material to wetlands or other waters of the United States generally must obtain authorization for the discharge from the United States Army Corps of Engineers USAGEor a state approved to administer the section program.
Such authorization can be through issuance of an individual permit, or may be subject to a general permit, which applies to certain categories of activities having minimal adverse environmental effects. The USAGE is responsible for reviewing permit applications and deciding whether to issue or deny permits.
Sacramento, CA, USA Auction Site | Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers
More information about the program is provided at http: Under the program, EPA provides grants or "seed money" to all 50 states plus Puerto Rico to capitalize state loan funds. The states, in turn, make loans to communities, individuals, and others for high-priority water quality activities. As money is paid back into the revolving fund, new loans are made to other recipients. When funded with a loan from this program, a project typically costs much less than it would if funded through the bond market.
Many states offer low or no interest rate loans to small and disadvantaged communities. In recent years, state programs have begun to devote an increasing volume of loans to nonpoint source, estuary management, and other water-quality projects.
Eligible NPS projects include almost any activity that a state has identified in its nonpoint source management plan. Such activities include projects to control runoff from agricultural land; conservation tillage and other projects to address soil erosion; development of streambank buffer zones; and wetlands protection and restoration.
Under section d of the Clean Water Act, states are required to compile a list of impaired waters that fail to meet any of their applicable water quality standards or cannot support their designated or existing uses. This list, called a d list, is submitted to Congress every 2 years, and states are required to develop a Total Maximum Daily Load TMDL for each pollutant causing impairment for waterbodies on the list. More information on the TMDL program and d lists is provided at http: Section of the Clean Water Act requires that any applicant for a federal license or permit to conduct any activity that "may result in any discharge" into navigable waters must obtain a certification from the state or tribe in which the discharge originates that the discharge will comply with various provisions of the Clean Water Act, including sections and The federal license or permit may not be issued unless the state or tribe has granted or waived certification.
The certification shall include conditions, e. Such conditions must be included in the federal license or permit. Under the National Estuary Program, states work together to evaluate water quality problems and their sources, collect and compile water quality data, and integrate management efforts to improve conditions in estuaries.
To date, 28 estuaries have been accepted into the program. Estuary programs can be an excellent source of water quality data and can provide information on management practices. More information on the National Estuary Program is provided at http: Many areas, especially urban fringe areas, need to maintain or improve the quality of surface and ground waters that are used as drinking water sources.
Two excellent resources for learning more about the Clean Water Act and the many programs established under it are The Clean Water Act: Watershed Approach EPA recommends the use of a watershed approach as the key framework for dealing with problems caused by runoff and other sources that impair surface waters USEPA, The watershed protection approach is a comprehensive planning process that considers all natural resources in the watershed, as well as social, cultural, and economic factors.
The watershed approach should address the following: The watershed approach framework can be applied to address impacts caused by hydromodification activities throughout a watershed. Additionally, the watershed approach can help to identify and address problems within a watershed that increase NPS pollution associated with hydromodification activities.
Major elements of successful watershed approaches involve: A key attribute of the watershed approach is that it can be applied with equal success to large- and small-scale watersheds. Federal agencies, states, interstate commissions, and tribes usually apply the approach on larger scales, such as watersheds square miles in size.
Local agencies and urban communities can apply the approach to watersheds as small as 1 square mile in size. Local runoff management program officials must be especially conscious of watershed scale when planning and implementing specific management practices. For example, nonstructural practices, such as stream protection ordinances and public education campaigns, are usually applied community wide.
Consequently, the results benefit many small watersheds. In contrast, structural practices, such as soil bioengineering, usually provide direct benefits to a single stream. Regional structural management practices such as headland breakwater systems for larger watersheds can be used, but they do not protect smaller contributing streams. Given limited resources, program officials must often analyze cost and benefits and choose between large- and small-scale practices.
Often, a combination of nonstructural and structural practices is the most cost effective approach. An example of the watershed approach being used for hydromodification activities is the South Myrtle Creek Ditch Project. South Myrtle Creek, which flows into the South Umpqua River in Oregon, was historically populated with cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarkf and coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch.
However, since the early 20th century, diversion structures, used primarily for providing water for irrigating agricultural crops, have blocked the passage offish through its waters USEPA, c. One example of the diversion structures was a diversion dam with a concrete apron, which was installed in a portion of South Myrtle Creek to raise the water level in an impoundment to provide irrigation water for adjacent and downstream landowners.
During the summer, water levels in the creek would elevate 14 feet above natural levels and were diverted into a 2. Ultimately, hydromodification of this stream caused flow modifications and high stream temperatures, which degraded water quality for the native trout and salmon populations.
In one of the landowners initiated a project to restore flow and improve water quality in South Myrtle Creek. The project used the three guiding principles of the watershed approach to restore the health of the creek. The project was a collaborative effort of landowners, who donated services and supplies.
The project received funding and support from government agencies, such as the U. Resource management activities were directed specifically to the creek and the drainage ditch, where flow restoration and improved water quality were desired.
An assessment of South Myrtle Creek identified water quality problems from flow modification and high stream temperatures as the priority problems in the creek. The diversion dam and concrete apron were found to be causing the problems. Landowners, the Water Resources Department, and the Watershed Enhancement Board developed a plan, the goal of which was to restore flow and improve water quality in the creek.
The irrigation system was switched to a sprinkler type system, which is more efficient than the original ditch irrigation.
In addition, the denuded riparian area was revegetated to help lower stream temperatures and new seedlings were protected with fencing to keep away livestock. With the cooperation of the landowners, the county and state governments, and other interested parties, the South Myrtle Creek Ditch Project was a success. Water temperatures have improved and flows have increased by 2. Restoration of the streambed to its historical level has allowed passage of salmon and trout to the 10 miles of stream above the dam USEPA, c.
Additional information about the project is available at http: Introduction to Management Measures Management measures are implemented to control nonpoint source pollution for a variety of purposes, including protection of water resources, aquatic wildlife habitat, and land downstream from increased pollution and flood risks.
Management measures control the delivery of NFS pollutants to receiving water resources by: The intent of the six management measures in this guidance document is to provide information for addressing and considering the NFS pollution potential associated with hydromodification activities in all water pollution control activities in a watershed.
Implementation of management measures can minimize and control hydromodification NFS pollution through erosion and sediment control, chemical and pollutant control, management of instream and riparian habitat restoration, and protection of surface water quality.
This document also lists and describes management practices for each management measure. Management practices are specific actions taken to achieve, or aid in the achievement of, a management measure. A more familiar term might be best management practice BMP. The word "best" has been dropped for the purposes of this guidance as it was in the Coastal Management Measures Guidance because the adjective is too subjective.
The "best" practice in one area or situation might be entirely inappropriate in another area or situation. The practices listed in this document have been found by EPA to be representative of the types of practices that can be applied successfully to achieve the management measures. EPA recognizes that there is often site-specific, regional, and national variability in the selection of appropriate practices, as well as in the design constraints and pollution control effectiveness of practices.
The practices presented for each management measure are not all-inclusive. States or local agencies and EPA D - DRAFT July Introduction communities might wish to apply other technically and environmentally sound practices to achieve the goals of the management measures. Channelization and Channel Modification Channelization can cause changes, such as a reduction in freshwater supply, and results in the faster delivery of pollutants.
Channel modification might result in a combination of harmful effects higher flows or increased risk of flooding and beneficial effects prevent the increase in delivery of sediment to marshes or enhance flushing in a stream channel, which would help improve fish spawning activities.
The two management measures for channelization and channel modification are intended to protect waterbodies by ensuring proper planning before the proposed project is implemented, which helps to correct or prevent detrimental changes to the instream and riparian habitat. Implementation of the management measures can also ensure that operation and maintenance programs for existing projects improve physical and chemical characteristics of surface waters when possible.
Ensure that the planning process for new hydromodification projects addresses changes to physical and chemical characteristics of surface waters that may occur as a result of the proposed work. For existing projects, ensure that operation and maintenance programs use any opportunities available to improve the physical and chemical characteristics of surface waters.
Correct or prevent detrimental changes to instream and riparian habitat from the impacts of channelization and channel modification projects, both proposed and existing. Dams When dams are constructed, the turbidity and sedimentation in a waterway is often increased.
Construction activities, chemical spills during dams operation or maintenance, and reduced downstream flushing alters the nature of the waterbody. The management measures for dams are intended to be applied to the construction of new dams, as well as any construction activities associated with the maintenance of dams. They can be applied to dam operations that result in the loss of desirable surface water quality, and instream and riparian habitat.
Management Measure for Erosion and Sediment Control: Prevent sediment from entering surface waters during the construction or maintenance of dams.
Management Measure for Chemical and Pollutant Control: Prevent downstream contamination from pollutants associated with dam construction and operation and maintenance activities. Protect the quality of surface waters and aquatic habitat in reservoirs and in the downstream portions of rivers and streams that are influenced by the quality of water contained in the releases tailwaters from reservoir impoundments.
Habitats can be buried and wetlands can be filled. As runoff upstream increases, more erosion results on downstream streambanks. The Streambank and shoreline erosion management measure promotes the necessary actions required to correct Streambank and shoreline erosion where it must be controlled. Because erosion is a natural process, this management measure is not intended to be applied to all erosion occurring on streambanks and shorelines.
Management Measure for Eroding Streambanks and Shorelines: Protect streambanks and shorelines from erosion and promote institutional measures that establish minimum setback requirements or measures that allow a buffer zone to reduce concentrated flows and promote infiltration of surface water runoff in areas adjacent to the shoreline.
Document Organization This document is divided into three sections Channelization and Channel Modification, Dams, and Streambank and Shoreline Erosionwhich focus on individual management measures that are specific to each type of hydromodification activity. Each section introduces the management measure s for the particular topic and presents a range of management practices that potentially can be implemented to achieve the management measure.
Boxed text and case studies throughout the chapters highlight important concepts and provide real-life examples of how select management practices have been implemented within communities. When available, information concerning effectiveness and costs of practices is included. The document also includes references and resources.
The References section documents all literature cited throughout the document. The Resources section includes an updated list of documents, technical guidance, journals, funding information, general hydromodification Internet links, listservers, and educational materials. Two appendices are included in this document: Planning and Balance Project planning and analysis are essential parts of success when using a methodological framework such as the watershed approach to minimize environmental impacts of NFS pollutants associated with hydromodification activities.
This document outlines the key steps in the ecological restoration decision framework as: A Resource Book for Protecting Ecosystems and Communities USEPA, a Both guidance documents offer a variety of case studies to provide readers with examples of the frameworks as they are applied to real-world situations.
EPA requires that these nine elements be addressed for section funded watershed plans and strongly recommends that they be included in all other watershed plans that are intended to remediate water quality impairments. The nine elements are listed below: Identification of causes of impairment and pollutant sources or groups of similar sources that need to be controlled to achieve needed load reductions, and any other goals identified in the watershed plan.
Sources that need to be controlled should be identified at the significant subcategory level along with estimates of the extent to which they are present in the watershed e. An estimate of the load reductions expected from management measures. A description of the nonpoint source management measures that will need to be implemented to achieve load reductions and a description of the critical areas in which those measures will be needed to implement this plan.
An information and education component used to enhance public understanding of the project and encourage their early and continued participation in selecting, designing, and implementing the nonpoint source management measures that will be implemented. Schedule for implementing the nonpoint source management measures identified in this plan that is reasonably expeditious.
A description of interim measurable milestones for determining whether nonpoint source management measures or other control actions are being implemented. A set of criteria that can be used to determine whether loading reductions are being achieved over time and substantial progress is being made toward attaining water quality standards. A monitoring component to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation efforts overtime, measured against the criteria established under item h immediately above.
NRCS provides assistance through their Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Program, whose purpose is to assist federal, state, local agencies, local government sponsors, tribal governments, and program participants to protect and restore watersheds from damage caused by erosion, floodwater, and sediment, to conserve and develop water and land resources, and to solve natural resource and related economic problems on a watershed basis. The program provides technical and financial assistance to local people or project sponsors, builds partnerships, and requires local and state funding contribution.
Additional information about this program, as well as contact information is available at http: NRCS uses locally-led conservation programs, which are an extension of the agency's traditional assistance to individual farmers and ranchers for planning and installing conservation practices for soil erosion control, water management, and other purposes.
Adiós a tus imperfecciones
Through this effort, local people, generally with the leadership of conservation districts along with NRCS technical assistance, will assess their natural resource conditions and needs, set goals; identify ways to solve resource problems, utilize a broad array of programs to implement solutions, and measure their success.
Many of the management measures and practices recommended by EPA to reduce the NFS pollutant impacts associated with hydromodification activities stress the need to incorporate planning as a tool. States, local governments, or community groups should begin the planning process early when trying to determine how to address a particular NFS issue associated with a new or existing hydromodification project.
The planning process should bring key stakeholders together so that a variety of options can be explored to adequately define the problem and potential solutions. Once the issues are identified according to the various perspectives, project goals can be established to solve one or more environmental problems.
One important part of the planning process is the identification of the goals of the different stakeholders. Once these goals, which are sometimes different for the different groups of stakeholders, are identified and defined, the planning team can strive to achieve a balance among the needs of the various stakeholders. Often restoration compromises can be made to meet differing goals of the stakeholders to achieve a balance of the needs of the different groups.
For example, hydroelectric dams can be operated to produce minimum base flows downstream from the dam to support a variety of aquatic habitats, while still providing energy in a profitable manner. In addition, solutions that only allow for complete removal of the dam and restoration to preexisting stream conditions may not be possible because of other changes in the watershed e.
A compromise solution that enables the dam to continue to operate while minimizing environmental impacts and to enhance critical downstream habitats that support a desirable fish population may be the best solution. Creating Opportunities Part of the planning process and achievement of balance when evaluating techniques for restoring areas impacted by NFS pollution associated with hydromodification activities can be termed "creating opportunities.
Reducing runoff containing an abundant supply of nutrients from lawns surrounding the reservoir may lead to reductions in the algal bloom. The operations of the dam that creates the reservoir may be changed to enhance reservoir quality, as well as the quality of water being released from the dam. Changes in land use that result in increasing the permeability of land adjacent to a channelized stream can reduce the overall volume and velocity of water in the stream.
As flooding conditions are reduced, "hard" structures like bulkheads can be replaced with softer, vegetative solutions along the stream channel. The combination of reduced scouring flows associated with the greater stream velocities and vegetated channel banks can lead to improved instream ecological conditions. There are many other possible opportunities waiting to be found and implemented when projects are evaluated at the watershed level.
Channelization and Channel Modification Section 1 Channelization and Channel Modification Channelization and channel modification describe river and stream channel engineering undertaken for flood control, navigation, drainage improvement, and reduction of channel migration potential. Activities that fall into this category include straightening, widening, deepening, or relocating existing stream channels and clearing or snagging operations. These forms of hydromodification typically result in more uniform channel cross-sections, steeper stream gradients, and reduced average pool depths.
Channelization and channel modification also refer to the excavation of borrow pits, canals, underwater mining, or other practices that change the depth, width, or location of waterways, or embayments within waterways.
Channelization and channel modification activities can play a critical role in nonpoint source pollution by increasing the downstream delivery of pollutants and sediment that enter the water.
Some channelization and channel modification activities can also cause higher flows, which increases the risk of downstream flooding. Channelization and channel modification can: For example, straightening a stream channel can increase stream velocities and destroy downstream pool and riffle habitats.
As a result of less structure in the stream to retard velocities, downstream velocities may continue to increase and lead to more frequent and severe erosion. There are often differing views defining the stability of a stream channel. From a navigation perspective, the stream channel is considered stable if shipping channels are maintained to enable safe movement of vessels.
Landowners with property adjacent to a stream might consider the stream to be stable if it does not flood and erosion is minimal. Ecologists might find some erosion of streambanks and meandering channels to be a part of natural evolution i. In any case, new and existing channelization projects should be evaluated with these differing perspectives in mind and a balance of these perspectives taken into account when constructing or maintaining a project.
Often, multiple priorities can be maintained with good up-front planning and communication among the different stakeholders involved. There are four key characteristics of a channel, which are channel slope, depth, width, and planform, that may adjust to reflect changes in basin inputs.
The factors that affect the basin characteristics were described in Watson et al. July Section 1: When the channel is able to maintain these adjustments without agrading depositing or degrading erodingit is considered to be in dynamic equilibrium Watson et al. When disturbed, the channel attempts to regain a state of equilibrium by making adjustments, which can consist of changes to the channel elevation by aggradation or degradation or in the channel planform Biedenharn et al.
Hydromodification activities, such as channelization and channel modification, can affect a stream channel's state of equilibrium, which is related to flow and the height of the water surface.
It is important to note that the stream is not static and is constantly adjusting to the changes, which could lead to instability, that naturally occur. Changes caused by or exacerbated by human activities may upset a critical balance and lead to a disruption of the dynamic equilibrium of the stream channel. When the factors affecting equilibrium become unbalanced, the stream attempts to regain equilibrium and nonpoint source pollution can result. Stream channels are often characterized by a series of riffle, pool, and run habitats Figure 1.
Riffles are shallow, turbulent, and swiftly flowing stretches of water that flow over partially or totally submerged rocks.
These areas are well oxygenated and have a "patchy distribution of organisms," which means that different types of organisms are naturally found in different parts of the riffle. Pools are distinct habitats within the stream where the velocity of the water is reduced and the depth of the water is greater than most other stream areas. Sediments can deposit in pools, which can lead to the formation of islands, shoals, or point bars.
Sediment can also result in the complete filling of pools. His introduction immediately improved the team's play and Michael Carrick scored the winner on 86 minutes. After the game, to the relief of most United fans, Ferguson announced the club had commenced talks to sign Tevez on a permanent deal.
This news came on the same day as claims in The Sun that United lawyers were looking into the possibility of a Bosman -type case, which would allow Tevez to be signed for free.
As he left the field, the Manchester United supporters applauded him in what would be his last match at Old Trafford for United. United chief executive David Gill suggested that Tevez's future would be resolved by early June Nevertheless, reports also emerged that Tevez had ruled out signing for Liverpool, given the implications of a Manchester United player moving to join their north-west rivals.
Tevez was given the number 32 shirt, just as he was at Manchester United and West Ham. In signing for Manchester City, Tevez became the first player to move between the two Manchester clubs since Terry Cooke moved from United to City in The billboard was located at the top of Deansgate in Manchester city centre, which leads to Salford and Traffordwhere Old Trafford is outside the boundaries of Manchester.
He scored his first goal for the club on 27 August against Crystal Palace in the second round of the League Cupheading-in City's second goal in a 2—0 victory. He set up his side's first goal for Gareth Barrybut City ended up losing 4—3. One week later he scored twice in a 3—3 draw with Bolton Wanderers. His next two goals came against Sunderland and Stoke Cityscoring six goals in as many matches.
On 28 December, he continued his goalscoring run, scoring two against Wolverhampton Wanderersmaking it eight goals in seven matches. Despite United taking a 1—0 lead, Tevez hit the equaliser in from the penalty spot before heading the winner in the 65th minute. However, a stoppage-time goal from Wayne Rooney sent Manchester United through to the final with a 4—3 aggregate win. Despite losing the captain's armband to Vincent KompanyTevez stated in an interview he had a complete turn around on his stance on Manchester and that he is not moving: He celebrated his third strike with a golf swing, in response to the pundits who questioned his desire during his leave of absence in which he was pictured on the golf course.
Speaking after the match, Tevez said, "I have always had a fantastic relationship with the West Ham supporters. They were singing my name before the game and that's why I did that Hammers salutein tribute to them.
I've always felt really at home there. He also spoke about his future and when he would return to Argentina: After the World Cupwe'll see. I could finish my contract next year and go to Boca.
Three weeks later, he scored twice and assisted another at the Westfalenstadion as Juve beat the German club 3—0 to qualify for the quarter-finals. He also assisted his club's first and fourth goals, both scored by Giovanni Moreno. Tevez described his time in China as a "holiday".
At the Olympic Games in Greece, he won the gold medal — Argentina's first in any event since — and scored eight goals in six matches to be the top scorer of the competition.
This included the winner in the final against Paraguaytwo in a 6—0 group-stage rout of Serbia and Montenegro, and a hat-trick in a 4—0 quarter-final win over Costa Rica. He was the world's second-highest goalscorer of in overall international competition with 16 goals, one fewer than Iran forward Ali Daei. Five minutes after coming on for Lionel Messihe scored to conclude a 4—1 group stage comeback defeat of the United States in Maracaibo.
Tevez later apologised for the incident. He scored twice in the tournament, both goals coming in the round of 16 match against Mexico. His first goal was a header scored in controversial style as he was in an offside position as Lionel Messi passed to him. However, the offside was missed by the referee's assistant and the goal was allowed to stand.
Tevez scored his second goal of the game with a powerful shot from outside the box.